From CNN:

Less than an hour after Barack Obama’s team told reporters that John McCain’s Wednesday announcement that he would be suspending his campaign came after the Democratic nominee suggested a joint statement from both candidates on the financial crisis, the McCain camp issued its own account of talks between the two men.

"Senator Obama phoned Senator McCain at 8:30 am this morning but did not reach him," the campaign said in a memo sent to reporters. "The topic of Senator Obama’s call to Senator McCain was never discussed.

"Senator McCain was meeting with economic advisers and talking to leaders in Congress throughout the day prior to calling Senator Obama. At 2:30 pm, Senator McCain phoned Senator Obama and expressed deep concern that the plan on the table would not pass as it currently stands. He asked Senator Obama to join him in returning to Washington to lead a bipartisan effort to solve this problem."

Minutes after McCain’s Wednesday statement, Obama’s campaign said that the Democratic nominee had called McCain earlier that morning to ask him if he would be willing to issue a joint statement on the economy and "urg[e] Congress and the White House to act in a bipartisan manner to pass such a proposal." They also said that McCain returned the call at 2:30 Wednesday afternoon and agreed to join him in issuing such a statement, and that the two campaigns are currently "working together on the details." McCain’s announcement came shortly before 3 p.m. ET.

 

So..McCain got a call from Obama in the A.M., but even though it wasn’t the magic 3AM call, McCain still wasn’t around to acknowledge it. Supposedly. I’m more inclined to believe that they did talk, but McCain just got good and GOP-reedy for credit for the idea. Adding on that he wants to avoid the debates at any cost, and this clears the way to excuse  Sarah from having to debate Joe as well. After all, after Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan felt her up, she probably wants to take a calgon bath anyways.

 

Now, on to the big news. Here are my suggested modifications to the economic bailout bill.

  1. Any company that accepts the bailout has to cap their executive salaries at 2.5 Mil (or 10x the President’s salary) for the duration before the amount is repaid.
  2. All executive termination compensation agreements are changed to no greater than 6 months (at the 2.5 mil) in salary, 6 months medical,  and a no-compete in the same sector for 3 months.
  3. Any company that allows their execs to bail before accepting the assistance, would have to divert the amount of the golden parachute package off the top of the bailout as a 100% repayable portion at %10 interest to be paid before any profit can be realized to shareholders.
  4. All packages include the govt becoming a percentage partner commensurate with the percentage of the aid in proportion to the company’s net worth on the day of accepting the loan until such a time as the company repays the loan at a  interest rate twice the prime rate on the day of acceptance.
  5. Shareholders cannot be paid at a percentage of net profits greater than the percentage amount of the aid initially provided as calculated in the previous point.

Give me those five points and I think I *might* go along with it.

 

 

from http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/palins-revelations-repent-the-end-is-near/

Rev. Howard Bess:

Palin now denies that she wanted to censor library books, but Bess insists that his book was on a “hit list” targeted by Palin. “I’m as certain of that as I am that I’m sitting here. This is a small town, we all know each other. People in city government have confirmed to me what Sarah was trying to do.”

[He] says that Palin also helped push the evangelical drive to take over the Mat-Su Borough school board. “She wanted to get people who believed in creationism on the board,” said Munger, a music composer and teacher. “I bumped into her once after my band played at a graduation ceremony at the Assembly of God. I said, ‘Sarah, how can you believe in creationism — your father’s a science teacher.’ And she said, ‘We don’t have to agree on everything.’

“I pushed her on the earth’s creation, whether it was really less than 7,000 years old and whether dinosaurs and humans walked the earth at the same time. And she said yes, she’d seen images somewhere of dinosaur fossils with human footprints in them.”

Munger also asked Palin if she truly believed in the End of Days, the doomsday scenario when the Messiah will return. “She looked in my eyes and said, ‘Yes, I think I will see Jesus come back to earth in my lifetime.’”

Sarah Palin ABC Interview With Charlie Gibson Part 1

GIBSON: But this is not just reforming a government.
This is also running a government on the huge international stage in a
very dangerous world. When I asked John McCain about your national
security credentials, he cited the fact that you have commanded the
Alaskan National Guard and that Alaska is close to Russia. Are those
sufficient credentials?

PALIN: But it is about reform of government and it’s about putting
government back on the side of the people, and that has much to do with
foreign policy and national security issues Let me speak specifically
about a credential that I do bring to this table, Charlie, and that’s
with the energy independence that I’ve been working on for these years
as the governor of this state that produces nearly 20 percent of the
U.S. domestic supply of energy, that I worked on as chairman of the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, overseeing the oil and gas
development in our state to produce more for the United States.

GIBSON: I know. I’m just saying that national security is a whole lot more than energy.

PALIN: It is, but I want you to not lose sight of the
fact that energy is a foundation of national security. It’s that
important. It’s that significant.

GIBSON: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?

PALIN:  In what respect, Charlie? (no clue what the Bush Doctrine is)

GIBSON: The Bush — well, what do you — what do you interpret it to be?

PALIN: His world view. (Hopeful)

GIBSON: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war.

 

I realize everyone is good and tired of hearing about her, but some of her recent comments have come to frighten me. In her interview with Charlie Gibson on 20/20, Sarah, when asked about the Bush Doctrine, first responded by asking what Charlie meant by tat phrase…. I may not be a Poly Sci major, but even little ole I know what the “Bush Doctrine” is. I know how it was first presented, in a speech, as official policy of the Bush presidency as it related to foreign policy, and how it was modified and expanded over the years. I am smart enough to realize that even if you don’t know the major policy points of every single presidency, you should at least be basically conversant with the current policy, especially if you are trying to be but a heartbeat away from having to either defend or modify that doctrine. To not know that, is excusable if you’re an average Joe, or a elementary school student, but is completely inexcusable if you’re running to be V.P. Furthermore, trying to bullshit your way through an answer that has absolutely nothing to do with the original question shows a pretty deep intellectual weakness. She also, when queried about her qualifications as an expert on Russia, stated that her state’s proximity to Russia, provides her that expertise, by this rationale, my proximity to Kansas makes me an expert on growing corn, and if I lived in texas I’d be a policy expert on South America.
Now, another small point I want to make tonight is that as a race, Blacks are probably a lot more socially conservative than most people would believe. What forms the way we end up voting is that we believe that personal morality should never be enforced as public policy. We have something of a memory of that being the case in America’s past in a way that affected us rather adversely. it’s okay to be ant-abortion, anti-immigration, anti-homosexuality from a personal point of view. Maybe YOU would never have an abortion, maybe YOU would never be homosexual, that’s fine, you don’t have to have an abortion, you don’t have to go out and have a homosexual experience. But what you do and believe should not and cannot be forced on others. Every person’s morals are personal and private, and should never spring from legislation, but from personal belief. After all, there are large segments of America that believe miscegenation is immoral, should those laws be reinstated as well?, should a official national religion be defined? and if so, which segment? Baptist, Southern Baptist, Methodist, Pentecostal, Catholic, Lutheran, AME? It’s a slippery slope and our nation, and our children would be best served if we stayed on the even path, the center road, and stayed off the deges on EITHER side.

 

An Alaska judge warned Gov. Sarah Palin’s family against trying to
get her then-brother-in-law fired, according to court records.

Investigators want to know if Sarah Palin tried to use her position improperly to get her former brother-in-law fired.

That warning came long before the controversy over her dismissal of the
brother-in-law’s boss, the state’s public safety commissioner, records
show.

Palin, the Republican nominee for vice president, is
battling allegations she and her advisers pressured Public Safety
Commissioner Walt Monegan to fire her sister’s husband, State Trooper
Mike Wooten.

Palin’s sister, Molly McCann, and Wooten were in
the process of getting a divorce when the judge hearing the couple’s
case said McCann’s family appeared to be putting Wooten’s job at risk
at a time when he would be required to pay child support.

“It
appears for the world that Ms. McCann and her family have decided to
take after the guy’s livelihood, that whatever who did what to whom has
overridden good judgment,” Superior Court Judge John Suddock said
during an October 2005 hearing. “Aesop told us not to slay the goose
that lays the golden egg. For whatever reason, people are trying to
slay the goose here, and it tends to diminish his earning capacity.”

At the time, Palin
was a private citizen and would not become governor until 2006. In
complaints filed with the state police, she and other relatives had
accused Wooten of threatening her family during the divorce.

Suddock was in the process of settling the couple’s property and
child-support arrangements in the 2005 hearing. The judge said his
decision might have been different had Wooten’s continued employment
with the state police been more certain.

“The plaintiff’s table has created a situation where that is a very fragile outcome,” he said.

Wooten’s union representative testified that the trooper was the
subject of a “constant stream” of complaints from his ex-wife’s family.
“If things don’t change, Mike’s career is in jeopardy,” the union rep
said.

“My advice to Mike was to find another job,” said John
Cyr, now executive director of the Public Safety Employees Association.
“I think he needs, career-wise, to look for work elsewhere.”

CNN
obtained audio recordings of the hearing from the court clerk’s office
in Anchorage, Alaska. Roberta Erwin, the attorney who represented
McCann, declined comment on the case Wednesday, and other
representatives of the governor did not immediately return phone calls.

Wooten was suspended for five days in March 2006, after state police
commanders determined he had used a Taser on his 10-year-old stepson
“in a training capacity,” drove his patrol car while drinking beer and
illegally shot a moose using his wife’s hunting permit.

In a
February 2008 hearing over new custody issues, Wooten briefly
complained that “disparagement” by his ex-wife’s family was continuing.

Complaints about Wooten from Palin and her family have been under
scrutiny since Gov. Palin’s July firing of Monegan, whose duties
included management of the state police force. After his dismissal,
Monegan said he was fired because he refused to succumb to pressure
from the governor’s office to fire Wooten, and his allegations have led
to an investigation by the state Legislature.

Palin has denied
any wrongdoing, saying the commissioner was removed because of
disagreements over budget issues. Her attorneys have called Wooten a
“rogue trooper” and said no one in the governor’s family knew of his
suspension until after Monegan’s dismissal.

Spokesmen for Sen.
John McCain’s presidential campaign have said the legislative probe has
become a “political circus” since McCain tapped Palin as his running
mate in August.

Palin originally pledged to cooperate with the
investigation and disclosed that members of her administration had
contacted state police officials nearly two dozen times to discuss
Wooten. But last week, she asked the state personnel board to conduct
its own probe, and a string of witnesses has failed to show up at
scheduled depositions with the investigator hired by the Legislature.

Last week, Cyr’s union filed its own complaint against Palin and top
aides, accusing them of improperly attempting to use confidential
information from Wooten’s personnel files against him. The McCain
campaign says Wooten agreed to release his files during the divorce
proceedings, and the information was in the public domain.

 

Alaskans Speak (In A Frightened Whisper): Palin Is “Racist, Sexist, Vindictive, And Mean”

by Charley James

“So Sambo beat the bitch!”

This is how Republican Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin described Barack Obama’s win over Hillary Clinton to political colleagues in a restaurant a few days after Obama locked up the Democratic Party presidential nomination.
Continue reading »

 

From: http://www.washingtonindependent.com/3671/the-reform-candidate
Submitted by Michael Wrightson on Sept 1, 2008

A note to all by {the Author}

Dear friends,

So many people have asked me about what I know about Sarah Palin in the
last 2 days that I decided to write something up . . .

Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in
common: their gender and their good looks.

Thanks,

Anne Continue reading »

 

Let’s take a look back about 6 months…

“When I hear a statement like that coming from a woman candidate with any kind of perceived whine about the excess criticism or maybe a sharper microscope put on her, I think, man, that doesn’t do us any good,” Palin told Newsweek magazine in March.

 
McCain is defending his choice of Palin.

Presumptive Republican nominee John McCain defended his campaign’s vetting of newly named VP candidate Sarah Palin Tuesday, amid a stream of revelations about the Alaska governor that could potentially harm the GOP presidential ticket.

“My vetting process was completely thorough and I’m grateful for the results,” McCain told reporters in Philadelphia.

The comments come a day after Palin announced her 17-year-old daughter was pregnant and news surfaced the Alaska governor had hired a lawyer weeks ago to act on her behalf as state legislators investigate whether she may have abused her power in the firing of the state’s police chief for refusing to fire her ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper.

Speaking on Fox News earlier Tuesday, former top Bush aide Karl Rove echoed McCain’s comments that Palin was fully vetted.

“They knew all of it,” Rove said of the recent revelations on Palin.

McCain has previously faced fire from Democrats over the fact the Arizona senator only met with Palin once in person before offering her the No. 2 slot on his ticket.

IOW. When it comes to us and our choices, we can do what we want, any faults are not important, any controversy is heretic and unpatriotic and treasonous. The Family Values we want America to have by force of law apply to the little people, not the rulers… Duh.

 

Eight is Enough. three words that encapsulate, crystalize, and clarify everything important in this election cycle. This small, seemingly innocuous phrase will be, in my opinion, the very cornerstone in the most effective attack on McCain to date. No matter what else McCain tries to say, he is still of the party of the last eight. He still embodies the twisted ideals that have led us on this ruinous road, he is the mascot of the last eight, and as Barack said, Eight IS enough.
I;m sure that everyone expected Barack to let Biden be his attack dog, expected Barack to rely on sunny plattitudes, expected Barack to take the high, hands off road. And counter to that expectation by every single Pundit, Barack too McCain head on, and framed him for what he really is, the continuation of the same path. the same negative progress, the same failure and stagnation.
I’m sure that Barack wasn’t expected to take head on the impression of Celebrity, but yet and so, he did so. He framed his story, and made it the story of every person. Each aspect had a familiar struggle, not patronage, but work.
I’m sure that McCain’s camp did not expect Barack to attack headlong, the threat of dirty politics, but yet he did. And effectively so.

 

per Mark Penn, former Clinton advisor and strategist:

“The Paris Hilton ad also bore a Republican political trademark — attacking a candidate’s strengths rather than the candidate’s weaknesses,” Penn wrote. The spot attempted to portray Obama’s leadership for change as something fluffy and useless. Obama did not immediately hit back on the air.”

I’m guessing that mark revrels in the dirt of politics and can’t comprehend that there might just possibly be a tiredness in AMerica of the negative campaigning. WHat he instaed proposes is that the very thing that makes Obama so compelling, his general civility on campaigning is a weakness. According to Penn, one should never speak of their own positions, just attack the other candidate in unclear, nonspecific ways that bear no relationship to reality.

According to Penn, diversity is a bad thing, American thinking means thinking in the same stilted politics of the past, and any diversion therefrom is wrong. Maybe Penn should work for the republicans, he’s right at home in their dirt pile.

© 2012 AmericasBlood.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Secured for spam by MLW and Associates, LLP's Super CAPTCHASecured by Super-CAPTCHA Developed by Goldsboro Web Development..