Special “Guest Asshat” columnist Andrew Adler on assassinating the sitting President of the U.S.

 General Politics  No Responses »
Jan 202012
 

Please note, that the views expressed below are NOT the views of AmericasBlood, we DO NOT condone, approve of, like or in any way support the asshattery going on below, but we DO think that everyone should get to know our “special” (in a short yellow bus kind of way) Mr Andrew B Adler of the ATLJewishTimes.com. Bold Emphasis Mine

 

 

What would you do?

By Andrew B. Adler Owner/Publisher AAdler@ atljewishtimes .com

“…a war in 2017 would likely include the firing of 15,000 rockets and missiles into Israeli cities, causing unprecedented devastation and casualties.”
(Jerusalem Post 1/3/2012 online edition)

 

You are Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. You are responsible for 7 million Israeli citizens who comprise the state of Israel. You wake up one morning, and the Israel Defense Forces’ military commander hands you a detailed report regarding what to expect during a major conflict with Hezbollah and Syria five years from today.

The report states that Israel will come under fire from 15,000 rockets and missiles, and that casual-ties will be in the thousands. That’s thousands, not hundreds – thou-sands. Simultaneously, another IDF military commander strolls over while you are finishing your first cup of coffee and hands you a report that Iran has reached nuclear launch capabilities.

If that’s not enough, an Israeli diplomat informs you that you cannot expect much help from the United States due to its newly implemented military budget and the administration’s never ending “Alice in Wonderland” belief that diplomacy is the answer.

To all the Netanyahus out there, what do you do? Well, here are your “Kobayashi  Maru” options. “Kobayahi Maru” is a term used in “Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan” to de-scribe a no-win scenario or facing a solution that involves redefining the problem.

One, order a pre-emptive strike against both Hezbollah and Hamas, knowing that military and civilian casualties will be high, but not as high as they would be in 2017.

Two, go against Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s wishes that Israel take a lethal bullet in the name of preserving a healthy, worldwide economic climate, and order the destruction of Iran’s nuclear facilities at all costs.

Three, give the go-ahead for U.S.- based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.

Yes, you read “three” correctly. Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If I have thought of this Tom Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?

Another way of putting “three” into perspective goes something like this: How far would you go to save a nation comprised of seven million lives…Jews, Christians and Arabs alike?

You have got to believe, like I do, that all options are on the table. With this in mind, I again ask you, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, what would you do?

 

 

If you want to fax him a kind letter of regard:

 

ATLJewishTimes:
Phone: 404-564-4550
Fax: 770-350-7581

Andrew B Adler
(770) 579-8825
3431 Old Wagon Rd
Marietta, GA 30062-5513

 Posted by FatherStorm at 5:07 pm

Failed systems.

 General Politics, Gingrich, RealityCheck '12  No Responses »
Dec 292011
 

After his recent failure to secure a slot on the Virginia state Primary ballot, Newt Gingrich called the process a “Failed System”. Odd how the complaints only come when thongs don’t go your way. Does this mean that if Gingrich doesn’t place well in Iowa that their “First in the nation” status is also failed? Have we truly become a nation of “what doesn’t benefit me must be broken”? Get off the rhetorical high horse already Newt, you decodied to go with the cheap labor to get your signatures to get on the ballot and you got what you paid for.

 Posted by FatherStorm at 6:32 am

comic roundup

 General Politics  No Responses »
Dec 132011
 
TOMAHAWKS SOLVE EVERYTHING

TOMAHAWKS SOLVE EVERYTHING

Religism:

Religism:

Intolerance 2012

Intolerance 2012

What If?: Religion

What If?: Religion

 Posted by FatherStorm at 3:03 pm

Talking Across one’s self. Perry In Action.

 General Politics, RealityCheck '12  No Responses »
Dec 102011
 

Rick Perry seems to be getting lost in his own translation. In his latest ad, he makes the rather large assertion that President Obama has failed the Christians in America by allowing Gays to openly server in the military, and that the Federal Government has failed America by not legislatively protecting  religious freedoms in schools. Yet in virtually the following breath, Perry recently stated in an interview in Iowa that the Government had no place legislating  or deciding the legality of religious freedom issues, such deliberations should be left to the states individually. You can’t on the one hand blame President Obama for not pushing your religious adgenda on the one hand, and then accuse him of trampeling your rights by signing legislation that guarantees the freedoms of people you don’t like.  Additionally, somehow Perrry managed to say that he did not feel it was the place of the Supreme Court to argue and determine the legality of legislation.. That particular statement makes me wonder if there should not be some sort of civics exam that those running for office should be required to pass before they can throw their hat in the ring. Exactly how Perry can hold the thought in his head thet the judicial branch of the government does not have the saction of the constitution to judge, is beyond me… way beyond me. And not realizing that the Supreme Court consists of 9 justices? inexcusable. Please, Mr. Perry, take a community college course in civics and come back once you know a thing or two about the Government you want to run.

 Posted by FatherStorm at 11:42 am

War On Religious Freedom

 General Politics, Perry, RealityCheck '12  No Responses »
Dec 072011
 

Yeah,  know I just wrote about this last night but… Here is a snippet from Rick Perry’s latest video

 

“I’m not ashamed to admit that I’m a Christian, but you don’t need to be in the pew every Sunday to know there’s something wrong in this country when gays can serve openly in the military but our kids can’t openly celebrate Christmas or pray in school. As President, I’ll end Obama’s war on religion. And I’ll fight against liberal attacks on our religious heritage. Faith made America strong. It can make her strong again.”

So. Apparently, my takeaway again is, Religious Freedom for those with your identical Continue reading »

 Posted by FatherStorm at 3:50 pm

War On Christmas

 General Politics  No Responses »
Dec 072011
 

As is seasonal on their part, Fox News has again launched their regular season of bringing attention to all their viewers that “War On Christmas” being waged by everyone who does not drink their tea. And as always, they somehow manage to again tie the decisions people and municipalities back to a affront on the Constitutionally given freedon of religion. And they again, as they do EVERY year,somehow m iss that that very freedom they refer to might just somehow refer to everybody’s right to that freedom of religion, and NOT just to the particular church and branch that they adhere to. Is there any chance that a true Christian could possibly come to the view that there might not have been pine trees in Jerusalem, and that maybe Jesus did not put up a Christmas tree to celebrate his own birth? and that for us to do so might not have anything to actually do with Christianity as is taught in the bible? Nowhere was I able to find any verses in the bible that said, “And thou shalt cover thy tree with tinsel and lights”. So… lay off a touch and allow me my religion to worship God in the way I learned in the Bible, and not the way that F.A.O. Schwartz teaches.

 Posted by FatherStorm at 12:09 am

The conspiracy theorist in me is starting to come out…

 Cain, General Politics, Gingrich, RealityCheck '12  No Responses »
Dec 042011
 

Go back a couple months. Romney and Perry were right where they are, at the top of the realist’s leaderboard. And along comes Herman Cain, A Republican Idealist’s wet dream… A Black Conservative “Pulled Myself Up By My Own Bootstraps” millionaire willing to run for President. Herman Cain was everything the Republican Party needed, someone they could hang out there and tout their non-racism over, all the time knowing, hell they HAD to know, that in the end there would be some serious issues that would push him out of contention. At that point they would always be free to tout their inclusiveness and the fact thet he didn’t work out was most certainly not THEIR fault. Of course that requires our suspension of belief that somehow the  horde of lawyers that is the republican party prime, couldn’t dig up a multitude of civil settlements, and were so incompetent as to not have the good sense to ask to back-check at least a month’s worth of phone records for suspicious activity… Sorry I don’t buy it. Just as much as I don’t buy that they actually think that newt Gingrich has a snowball’s chance in hell in a Primary season against Pres. Obama. It’s all just chaff, a distraction, a way to keep the investigative focus on the frontrunner, and not digging too deeply into the two who in the end, one of which will be the party’s choice come the convention. Ignore Newt, he’s not the threat., dig into Romney and Perry while they sit back in the pack and are overconfident in their long-range strategy. Right now they are playing a Chinese 5-year plan to the press’s 5-minutes-of-fame obsession with the top poller-of-the-week.

 

After all, what other justification can you find for the incontrovertibly data-driven fact that virtually every single polling point that Herman Cain has lost due to his infidelity went to the only other candidate that publicly acknowledges multiple instances of infidelity? Unless of course you were to take the rather paranoid opinion that an African American cheating with a European American is not as forgivable as a candidate cheating within his race.

 

I’m sure I’ll write more about Newt in the days and weeks to come, but in the interim, let me leave you with a qoute from Newt in 1985 when the Wall Street Journal asked him about his shirking of responibility to serve his country in Vietnam,

“Part of the question I had to ask myself was what difference I would have made.”

So. True. as President, what difference would you make? might as well not run.

 

 Posted by FatherStorm at 8:51 pm

I am not racist.

 General Politics, Weird News  No Responses »
Dec 022011
 

Read this following statement please…

“I am not racist. I will tell you that. I am not prejudiced against any race of people, have never in my lifetime spoke evil” about a race, said Thompson, the church’s former pastor who stepped down earlier this year. “That’s what this is being portrayed as, but it is not.”

Now this is the statement made by Melvin Thompson after he offered the following proposal at his Kentucky church.

 

“That the Gulnare Freewill Baptist Church does not condone interracial marriage. Parties of such marriages will not be received as members, nor will they they be used in worship services and other church functions, with the exception being funerals. All are welcome to our public worship services. This recommendation is not intended to judge the salvation of anyone, but is intended to promote greater unity among the church body and the community we serve.” Submitted to the church business committee November 9, 2011 for their consideration by Melvin Thompson, member, Gulnare Freewill Baptist Church.
Continue reading »

 Posted by FatherStorm at 10:31 pm

Ron Paul mauls Newt to death.

 General Politics, Gingrich, Paul, RealityCheck '12  No Responses »
Dec 022011
 

Wow. Ron Paul came out swinging for the fences with this one. I wonder if Newt knows what hit him?

 Posted by FatherStorm at 2:36 pm

The latest distilled number by level of Conservatism

 Bachman, Blogroll, Boehner, Cain, General Politics, Gingrich, Huntsman, RealityCheck '12, Romney, Santorum  No Responses »
Dec 022011
 

nate Silver, over at FiveThirtyEight, which is now a part of the New York Times,  has released his latest distillation of polling number in the way that only he can, with immense detail, verifiable facts, intelligent opinon, and overall the best in political coverage bar none.  so… based on his latest rollup of polling data, here’s a chart graphing the preference of the candidates across the conservatism spectrum of Republicans. It’s got one rather interesting feature I want to just point out real quick. Herman Cain’s support is VERY heavily loaded towards the uber-conservative side, which would tend to indicate that his current fidelity scandal may affect his numbers to a greater degree that it would affect him were he more popular with the moderate Republicans.  Maybe he shouldn’t have targeted quite THAT far towards the right?..

 Posted by FatherStorm at 11:27 am
 Older Entries
© 2012 AmericasBlood.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Secured for spam by MLW and Associates, LLP's Super CAPTCHASecured by Super-CAPTCHA Developed by Goldsboro Web Development..